The recently approved EU-Canada Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreement has sparked a heated debate among lawmakers and citizens alike.

Opinion 1/15, issued by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in April 2017, found that certain provisions of the agreement were incompatible with EU law, particularly with regards to the protection of personal data.

Under the PNR agreement, airlines are required to provide Canadian authorities with information on passengers flying between the EU and Canada, including their name, contact details, travel itinerary, and payment information. This data is then analyzed to identify potential terrorist threats.

While supporters argue that the agreement is necessary for national security purposes and has already proven effective in preventing terrorist attacks, critics have raised concerns about the potential for abuse and the violation of civil liberties.

The ECJ`s decision to strike down certain aspects of the agreement has been welcomed by privacy advocates, who argue that the EU must prioritize the protection of personal data and individual rights. However, it has also created uncertainty for airlines and passengers, who now face the possibility of differing PNR requirements when traveling between different countries.

In order to address these concerns, the EU and Canada have been in talks to negotiate a new PNR agreement that conforms to EU law while still allowing for effective security measures. However, finding a balance between security and privacy remains a challenge for policymakers around the world.

As a copy editor familiar with SEO, it is important to note that keywords related to this topic may include “PNR agreement,” “EU-Canada relations,” “data privacy,” “national security,” “terrorism,” and “civil liberties.” Including these terms in the article can help increase its visibility and relevance to online searches.